RESOURCES for RESEARCHERS

This page provides a variety of resources to support metatheoreticians, theorists, practitioners, and researchers.

Of particular interest is our public datatable. Using this searchable resource, you may sort theories by their complexity, included concepts, and robustness (internal integrity). Using this information, researchers can more easily choose the best possible theory for research and practical application




Click here to access datatable of FAST research results.










PRESENTATIONS






 

COURSES AVAILIBLE THROUGH FAST









ADDITIONAL READING

Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 98-106.

Anchin, J. C. (2008). Pursuing a unifying paradigm for psychotherapy: Tasks, dialectical considerations, and biopsychosocial systems metatheory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18(3), 310-349.

Bastedo, M. N. (2005, April 11-15, 2005). Metapolicy: Institutional change and the rationalization of public higher education.Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chernoff, F (2007). Theory and metatheory in International Relations: Concepts and contending accounts. New York: Palgrave.

Colomy, P. (1991). Metatheorizing in a postpositivist frame. Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 269-286.

Dervin, B. (1999). On studying information seeking methodologically: The implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 727-750.

Dubin, R. (1978).Theory building (Revised ed.). New York: The Free Press. Edwards, M. (2010). Organisational transformation for sustainability: An integral metatheory. New York: Routledge.

Faust, D., & Meehl, P. (2002). Using meta-scientific studies to clarify or resolve questions in the philosophy and history of science. Philosophy of Science, 69, S185-S196.

Fiske, D. W., & Shweder, R. A. (Eds.). (1986). Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fuchs, S. (1991).Metatheory as cognitive style. Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 287-301.

Heylighen, F. (1991). Evolutionary Foundations for Metaphysics, Epistemology and Ethics. In F. Heylighen (Ed.), Workbook of the 1st Principia Cybernetica Workshop (pp. 33-39). New York: Principia Cybernetica.

Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.

Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2 ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91-195). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Leong, S. M. (1985). Metatheory and metamethodology in marketing: A Lakatosian reconstruction. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 23-40.

Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 627-690.

McLaughlin, T. (1996). Street Smarts and Critical Theory: Listening to the Vernacular. University of Wisconsin Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1992). Cliometric metatheory: The actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science. Psychological Reports, 71, 339-467.

Meehl, P. E. (2002). Cliometric metatheory: II. Criteria scientists use in theory appraisal and why it is rational to do so. Psychological Reports, 91, 339-404.

Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery (K. Popper, J. Freed & L. Freed, Trans.). New York: Routledge Classics.

Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.

Ritzer, G. (1992). Metatheorizing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard Jr., J. W., & Lasorsa, D. L. (2004). How to Build Social Science Theories. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

Sklair, L. (1988). Transcending the impasse: Metatheory, theory, and empirical research in the sociology of development and underdevelopment. World Development, 16(6), 697-709.

Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. Oxford University Press.

Stein, Z. (2010).On the normative function of metatheoretical endeavors. Integral Review, 6(3), 5-22.

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1987). Constructing social theories.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tsoukas, H., & Knudsen, C. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Oxford University Press.

Turner, J. H. (1990). The misuse and use of metatheory. Sociological Forum, 5(1), 37-53.

Turner, J. H. (1991). Developing cumulative and practical knowledge through metatheorizing. Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 249-268.

Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wallis, S. E. (2008). From reductive to robust: Seeking the core of complex adaptive systems theory. In A. Yang & Y. Shan (Eds.), Intelligent complex adaptive systems (pp. 1-25). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.

Wallis, S. E. (2008). Validation of theory: Exploring and reframing Popper's worlds. Integral Review, 4(2), 71-91.

Wallis, S. E. (2009). The complexity of complexity theory: An innovative analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 11(4).

Wallis, S. E. (2009). Seeking the robust core of organisational learning theory. International Journal of Collaborative Enterprise, 1(2), 180-193.

Wallis, S. E. (2009). Seeking the robust core of social entrepreneurship theory. In J. A. Goldstein, J. K. Hazy & J. Silberstang (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship & Complexity. Litchfield Park, AZ: ISCE Publishing.

Wallis, S. E. (2010). The structure of theory and the structure of scientific revolutions: What constitutes an advance in theory? In S. E. Wallis (Ed.), Cybernetics and systems theory in management: Views, tools, and advancements (pp. 151-174). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Wallis, S. E. (2010). Towards developing effective ethics for effective behavior. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4).

Wallis, S. E. (2010). Towards the development of more robust policy models. Integral Review, 6(1), 153-160.
 
Wallis, S. E. (2011). Avoiding Policy Failure: A Workable Approach. Emergent Publications, ISBN: 9780984216505.


  Copyright 2011 - Foundation for the Advancement of Social Theory 
FOUNDATION
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF
SOCIAL THEORY

Contact us
FAST
Fellows
Connections & Conversations

Resources for Researchers

About Us 

This article discusses a variety of approaches for analyzing theory with an eye toward choosing the approach offering the greatest opportunity to advance theory.

This article discusses what metatheory "is" and how it may be advanced as a science.

In this article, Meehl calls for a statistical approach to the history of science with the goal of uncovering new insights into theory creation and validation.

A five minute video with a lighthearted look at metatheory


A PowerPoint overview of FAST

Analyzing Theory

Integrating Theory
(under construction)